Написал issue в nationstates
Jul. 10th, 2006 10:34 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
pargentumRise of the machines
Teenage hackers from @@RANDOMNAME@@ community college claim to create the Artifical Intelligence. They created a 200 line Perl script that chatted for half a year in college chat rooms and nobody ever suspected that it is not a human. Now they're trying to officially enroll this script as the college student.
Controvercy springs around the nation, whether we should allow non-human intelligent (or seemingly intelligent) beings full or partial benefits of the citzenship. Should AI have right to vote, right to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness?
[option] "All right" - says dean of AI department in @@NAME@@ national university - "If this program passes a properly set Turing test, I will be first to vote for citizenship for it. Also we can require all beings, human or not, to pass a Turing test before giving them the citizenship. Thus we also can rule out mentally retarded humans who are unfit to vote."
[effect] All teenagers reaching 18 must pass the test that includes regognising digits and letters in noisy pictures to prove that they are intelligent beings.
[stats] political freedom slightly decreases
[option] "This is nonsence" - says human right activist @@RANDOMNAME@@ - "human rights were given by God to humans, not to intelligent beings of unknown origin. Only living creatures carrying Homo Sapiens DNA are entitled to human and citizen rights"
[effect] Transgenic laboratory mices require citizenship and full welfare protection.
[stats]
[option] "This is nonsence" - says religious right activist @@RANDOMNAME@@ - "Human DNA is also present in tissue samples that are living in some sence. Only the creature that was born by woman can be considered human"
[effect] Children that were delivered in cesarean section must prove in court that they are humans.
[stats] religious influence increases, political freedom slightly decreases
Teenage hackers from @@RANDOMNAME@@ community college claim to create the Artifical Intelligence. They created a 200 line Perl script that chatted for half a year in college chat rooms and nobody ever suspected that it is not a human. Now they're trying to officially enroll this script as the college student.
Controvercy springs around the nation, whether we should allow non-human intelligent (or seemingly intelligent) beings full or partial benefits of the citzenship. Should AI have right to vote, right to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness?
[option] "All right" - says dean of AI department in @@NAME@@ national university - "If this program passes a properly set Turing test, I will be first to vote for citizenship for it. Also we can require all beings, human or not, to pass a Turing test before giving them the citizenship. Thus we also can rule out mentally retarded humans who are unfit to vote."
[effect] All teenagers reaching 18 must pass the test that includes regognising digits and letters in noisy pictures to prove that they are intelligent beings.
[stats] political freedom slightly decreases
[option] "This is nonsence" - says human right activist @@RANDOMNAME@@ - "human rights were given by God to humans, not to intelligent beings of unknown origin. Only living creatures carrying Homo Sapiens DNA are entitled to human and citizen rights"
[effect] Transgenic laboratory mices require citizenship and full welfare protection.
[stats]
[option] "This is nonsence" - says religious right activist @@RANDOMNAME@@ - "Human DNA is also present in tissue samples that are living in some sence. Only the creature that was born by woman can be considered human"
[effect] Children that were delivered in cesarean section must prove in court that they are humans.
[stats] religious influence increases, political freedom slightly decreases
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2006-07-10 05:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-10 05:20 am (UTC)В общем, согласен, что это не совсем правильно, это рудименты идеи, которая не нашла продолжения.
Да, идею про ДНК надо было приписать декану биологического факультета. А с "рожден женщиной" - надо думать, теологического.